Evergreen Connection engagement ring set

Designing rings that carry
meaning beyond the moment.

How might we design a his & hers engagement ring set that enhances symbolism and individuality — using nature as a shared visual language?

Industrial Designer
Rhino · Blender · Bambu Studio
Individual
2Rings in the set
8+3D-printed prototypes
3Design motifs
SLAFinal print method
01 — The Challenge

Simple ring sets are often familiar but forgettable.

Many couples choose rings that look alike but lack thoughtful decisions that enhance symbolism and individuality. The goal was to create a his & hers ring set where both visually communicate and are connected to each other, while remaining wearable as everyday objects — not just ceremonial ones.

“Rings should feel like they belong to you, not just to an occasion.”

Design brief — Des 421
Rings worn in context on hands

In-context rendering — both rings worn together

02 — Concept

Love, Bridge, Bloom.

The design language draws from nature. It brings together blooming leaves and gentle waves with a subtle bridge design that shows two lives meeting in the middle and growing as one.

Well lit rendering of the rings
03 — Ideation

Over 30 concepts
before a direction emerged.

Initial sketches explored a wide range of gem cuts — radiant, trillion, kite, oval, asscher, and marquise — and ring forms spanning minimalist bands to ornate floral structures. The two directions (hers and his) were sketched independently and then reconciled into a unified aesthetic system.

Initial ideation sketches — hers and his concepts
Refined sketch with annotated gem cuts

Left: Initial ideation — 30+ sketches exploring gem cuts and forms  /  Right: Refined sketch with final cut selection annotated

04 — Prototyping

Eight prints.
Each one teaching something new.

3D printing in PLA first allowed fast iteration on scale, proportion, and form, but the material could not capture fine surface detail. Switching to SLA resin in the final round resolved the intricate leaf prongs and baguette channels that PLA had blurred.

All 3D printed prototype iterations with annotations

PLA and SLA printed prototypes — annotated with issues resolved across rounds

PLA First material — fast but low on fine detail
SLA Final material — preserved intricate details
8+ Prototype iterations
05 — Design Decisions

Every detail
was intentional.

The final design resolved four key tensions: scale vs. delicacy, his vs. hers, ornamentation vs. wearability, and traditional vs. contemporary. Each decision has a rationale rooted in either function or meaning.

Stone Marquise Cut

The pointed ends read as leaves, reinforcing the floral motif.

Setting Leaf Prongs

Marquise-shaped prongs add a botanical detail at the crown.

Band (Hers) Split Arch

The arch tapers into a slim shank running along the split.

Band (His) Diamond Scatter

A diagonal pattern of diamonds. Masculine complement to "hers".

06 — Technical Specifications

Sized for real hands.
Built at true scale.

Both rings were designed to standard US ring sizes and validated through physical prototypes.

Women's ring dimensional drawings — size 8.5
Men's ring dimensional drawings — size 11.5

Left: Women's ring — US Size 8.5  /  Right: Men's ring — US Size 11.5

07 — Final Design

Rose gold. Warm.
Grounded in nature.

The final visual language pairs the warmth of rose gold with botanical form. The pair reads as a set: distinct individuals, same world.

Final rendering — in a spotlight with a call out

Hero render — Evergreen Connection set, rose gold with marquise diamond

08 — Reflection

What this project taught me.

01

Pairs are harder than singles

Designing two objects as a set introduced a constraint that shaped every decision — each element had to work in isolation and in dialogue with the other ring.

02

Symbolism must be legible

If the “bridge” arch needs explaining, it has failed as a design choice. The motif has to read immediately in the form, not in a caption.